Print This Post
With both David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel appearing on Sunday news shows and echoing the sentiments of Anita Dunn last week, the Whitehouse has taken the bold approach of being quite open and honest about their position as to whom and what Fox News actually is and isn’t.
The folks over at Fox have made it their mission to humiliate themselves even further.
Fox and Friends this morning, host Brian Kilmeade asked Dana Perino to back him up in his claim that the Good Ol’ Boys in the W Administration would never have stooped as low as the Evil Obama Empire. It didn’t work out so well for Fux and Fiends.
KILMEADE: And not only did you not go after them, you gave them interviews, as did the president.
DOOCY: Sure.
KILMEADE: Gave them all interviews. Read Ronald Reagan’s diaries…
PERINO: Towards the end we didn’t do a lot with MSNBC. That’s, that is the case.
Poor Brian. He probably felt a little bit like JiffyPopPapa when Balloon Boy barfed on air, “You guys said we’re doing it for a show.”
Last week, Fux News cheered like drunken frat boys over Ed Gillespie’s scathing public letter to NBC News President Steve Capus, in which Gillespie accused NBC and MSNBC of blurring the line between “news” and “opinion.”
*UPDATE*
Fox News has now responded by putting up a poll on their website. Surprise! None of the answers allow for the possibility that Obama and the Whitehouse might have a legitimate point.
*UPDATE*
Fox News has zeroed in on Anita Dunn as their new target. Following last week’s kerfuffle over her mention of Chairman Mao, Fox now seems to be under the impression that this video is going to be the final nail in her coffin:
I’m not entirely certain what is so damning here. Apparently this is proof positive that the Obama campaign sought to use technology to control the media. So what?
Related posts:
(Report comment)
Did you hear the latest “Jew” comments from the Rethugs?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/gopers-demint-like-a-jew_n_32 6295.html
The Republican party should just change it’s name to the American NeoNazi party.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
(Report comment)
saw it on Think Progress this afternoon. they’re not even attempting to hide it anymore.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 6:58 pm
(Report comment)
The only reason the right wing is pro-Israel is because the right wing is fundie.
They support Israel because Israel has to be destroyed for Christ to return.
Sickos. The support a nation because they want it in place to be destroyed for religious reasons
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 7:01 pm
(Report comment)
Yes, and when they’re all raptured, they want the Jews to go to hell. Hey, where are you?
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 7:07 pm
(Report comment)
Waiting impatiently
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 7:16 pm
(Report comment)
LMAO
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 8:09 pm
(Report comment)
I’m guessing the fundies are going to be none too happy with the new illustrated version of the Book of Genesis where everybody looks very very Jewish
[Reply]
(Report comment)
re Rachel Maddow show – Alan Grayson is the Pure Awesome … but can we please get someone in there to help with the hairdo?
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 7:15 pm
(Report comment)
Ghost writing again?
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 7:17 pm
(Report comment)
What could we do? There’s not much to work with there. I would like to change his wardrobe.
[Reply]
October 20th, 2009 at 8:11 am
(Report comment)
maybe it’s a good sign he’s not vain about his looks. perhaps this one can keep it in his pants.
btw, have you read his Wiki? very impressive!
[Reply]
October 20th, 2009 at 8:19 am
(Report comment)
Actually, it doesn’t matter how he looks, because it’s what he says and does ultimately. I will read his Wiki now.
[Reply]
(Report comment)
Chris Kofinis just said what I’ve been saying for weeks”
“I really think what you’re going to see in this party, as the months go by and they don’t make inroads with voters, is a civil war, ideologically within the Republican Party. All they end up doing is alienating voters even more, sowing the seeds of their own demise. And I would not be surprised if you start seeing this Republican Party potentially splintering into two.”
Gonna take a lot of years for either of the two new parties to build up enough of a base to win an election for even PTA president!
Yup Yup You Betcha!
[Reply]
(Report comment)
a troll at “elsewhere” has ’splained to me now why Anita Dunn’s comments re media control during campaign are so very damning!
zipowitz: “That is what makes this fight about FOX so relevant. The WH is now showing how petulant they really are by attacking the one news channel they couldn’t control, FOX. So because it’s p&$*ing them off, they are now trying to somehow dismiss them as irrelevant. If they can do so, then they control the media too.”
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 4:56 pm
(Report comment)
UGH! Stoopid trolls!
[Reply]
(Report comment)
oh, lord! Pat BuKlanan is on Hardball now talking about how unfair it is that the WH is smearing Fux News.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:16 pm
(Report comment)
ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz.. Honest to god. Unfair???? PB doesn’t know the meaning of the word.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:34 pm
(Report comment)
Libruls are so mean!
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:20 pm
(Report comment)
Well!!! isn’t that the pot calling the kettle black.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:25 pm
(Report comment)
Kit, Kit,….. shhhhh… start thinking of baskets full of kittens….. there, better now??
(That or have something alkafrolic.)
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 3:03 pm
(Report comment)
Door no. 2. A glass of chianti.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:59 pm
(Report comment)
More like the dooshbag calling the bidet beige
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 3:06 pm
(Report comment)
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:23 pm
(Report comment)
Par for the course with his type.
“Do as I say, not as I do”
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:26 pm
(Report comment)
Pat’s been cranky ever since his dry cleaner stopped taking his hood and robe.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:34 pm
(Report comment)
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:42 pm
(Report comment)
too bad he can’t get him one of those Good Wives from the 50s who love to iron and inhale starch
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 3:00 pm
(Report comment)
Have you seen his wife? Looks just like Miss Piggy
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 3:16 pm
(Report comment)
Please say she’s retarded. I can think of no other excuse for being with him. As Ron White says, The things that make you go blahhhh.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 3:02 pm
(Report comment)
I really don’t think anybody would have him. His sourpuss face screams cheap & mean.
[Reply]
(Report comment)
o/t vote tomorrow re Fed regulations on Big Banks – also gives more leeway to small banks.
this could be the door opening to credit flow to small business and creating more jobs
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/18/AR2009 101802156.html
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:08 pm
(Report comment)
Let us bray. One of the conservative Dems, a Ms. Bean, had to go home to Il. her daughter came down w/the flu.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:13 pm
(Report comment)
sounds like a Rethug or two might be willing to go with a Yea vote — though that could change after the waterboarding tonight
[Reply]
(Report comment)
Fox News isn’t even pretending anymore
Want proof that journalism has devolved into entertainment? Watch “the communications arm of the Republican Party”
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2009/10/15/fox_news/
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 11:52 am
(Report comment)
you know if I told a whopper like that I’d get my ass sued off, which might not be a bad idea, considering.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 1:02 pm
(Report comment)
I was doing it the hard way…….. giving up chocolate.
Less Arse was my no.4 of things to spend the lottery money on in todays Daily Question…. join me in a BOGOF deal???
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 1:06 pm
(Report comment)
What’s BOGOF ?
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 1:10 pm
(Report comment)
Deals you get in the supermarket?????
Buy One Get One Free ???? BOGOF !! Don’t you call them that???… There’s a new one for ya Kit….
We can get a BOGOF deal with the Arse Shrinkage Surgeon…. known to his friends as DR.ASS.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 1:13 pm
(Report comment)
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 1:15 pm
(Report comment)
I don’t do Twitter, so I’m not up on the abbreviations.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
(Report comment)
I’ve never twittered or faxed in my life!!!!!!
I only knew there were abbreviations when my Goddaughter E’d me and used some … 4 for for!!!!I went nuts and told her to stop talking Double Dutch and gobbledegook, and rite in proper Inglish like wot I wuz doin’.
My arse is actually OK… just wish there was a bit less of it…..!!!
Never had any complaints though, so, meh….
Booby tuck… that a reduction or an uplift????
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 1:59 pm
(Report comment)
Uplift, the force of gravity is beginning to pull on mine.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:09 pm
(Report comment)
you know, they have two new lift procedures that are looking really good — no “anchor scar.” One has some scarring on the areola and the other has small scar in the armpit.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:13 pm
(Report comment)
That’s cool. I’ll keep that in mind if I win the lottery. Hell, if I win the lottery we’ll all go have something done. Cosmetic procedure of your choice.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:27 pm
(Report comment)
Like I said on Daily Question Lottery…. Less arse and American teeth….
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:27 pm
(Report comment)
if men needed the procedure, it would be covered under their insurance and we’d see commercials for it all day long
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:32 pm
(Report comment)
You can get it done on the NHS if your doctor can vouch it is causing you distress etc……..
October 19th, 2009 at 2:36 pm
(Report comment)
LOL! Yes we would.
October 19th, 2009 at 2:45 pm
(Report comment)
scouser, what sort of evidence must one present to get coverage for that procedure? Three-inch welts from the bra straps, or cervical paralysis might do the job.
October 19th, 2009 at 2:58 pm
(Report comment)
Oh, believe me, we would.
October 19th, 2009 at 3:42 pm
(Report comment)
Either physical or mental distress….. causing you depression and affecting your life etc.
You can get sex change, anything like that if the doctor feels you should have it.
October 19th, 2009 at 2:20 pm
(Report comment)
I feel queasy.
I’m leaving well alone.The Equipment arrived when I was 13 and has stood me in good stead ever since…….. apart from having to go to the Rolls Royce Aeronautical (Engineering Division) or Lockheeds whenever I’ve needed a bra.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:28 pm
(Report comment)
those NASA bras are adorable
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:30 pm
(Report comment)
Well, they keep these babies up, and that ain’t no mean trick!!!!!
October 19th, 2009 at 2:13 pm
(Report comment)
Which one?Right or left?
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:16 pm
(Report comment)
Both of them, it’s genetic, has to be as I nevah was allowed to be without a brassiere. It’s not done.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:01 pm
(Report comment)
My greatniece is the same. & quotation marks every 2 min. Drives you crazy don’t it?
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:15 pm
(Report comment)
She only did it the once……. I threatened to cut of her G@T supply next time she came to visit!!!!!!!
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
(Report comment)
A regular circus of the absurd.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 12:38 pm
(Report comment)
Hi there border, can you provide a cover for our suzy who, I think,
will be in Vegas at the same time as the Oath Keepers? She could be our FRT spy. Is there any money left in the budget to equip her with a digital camera? We need proof positive, ha ha!
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 1:05 pm
(Report comment)
We know that…but idiots/ bigots will believe what they want to believe……… it’s Barney Frank’s dining table syndrome.
[Reply]
October 19th, 2009 at 2:18 pm
(Report comment)
What a farce. What’s disturbing is that so many people watch it.
[Reply]
(Report comment)
poor Faux Fiends — gonna be a long 8 years
[Reply]