Categorized | Daily Question

Daily Question

by BeyondGoodAndEvil

Visitors, if you like this post, please

Now that the public option has been stripped from the healthcare bill and there’s no Medicare buy-in, should Democrats scrap the bill and start over as Howard Dean suggested?

Is it just better to pass any healthcare bill than no healthcare bill?

Is the mandate fair, without the public option?

Watch Howard Dean:

Related posts:

  1. Daily Question
  2. Daily Question
  3. Online Chat With Howard Dean
  4. Email Just Received from Dr. Dean on Healthcare Pettition
  5. The White House and the Senate Bailing on the Public Option

If you liked this article,

Digg



This post was written by:


BeyondGoodAndEvil - who has written 158 posts on Free Range Talk.



Submit your own article via this simple form and we will format it for you for publishing.

 

7 Responses to “Daily Question”

Jump to Leave New Comment (Anyone can post)

  1. zoozey says:

    (Report comment)

    I want a decent bill, or no bill at at all. Haven’t read what is still in there, so I can’t comment fully. But to just throw something–anything–out there, would be bad. We need immediate catastrophic coverage now. No one whould have to be afraid to go to the ER if they are having chest pains–for fear that they will need surgery. No one should have to forego life-saving chemo because they can’t afford it. No one should have to go bankrupt because they DID decide to save his’her own life by running up credit card bills paying for it.

    No ifs, ands, or buts. If they had started with catastrophic coverage, we would have it by now. Worry about the other things later. If someone knew that they would get the catastrophic care paid for, I am sure they wouldn’t mind springing for the $50 office visit. Most ins. co. have a huge deductable for private plans anyhow. Most people just want to know they are covered in an emergency, long-haul situation.

    [Reply]

    zoozey
      

    (Report comment)

    How do we pay for “my” plan? Tax the hell out of the things that contribute to some catastrophes: cigarettes, fatty foods, empty filler foods. Yes, I know that poor people have to buy THOSE foods because they are cheaper. That’s the point. Make the healthier foods cheaper. There is no reason why my soy milk has to cost an arm and a leg. There is no reason that yogurt is much more expensive than jello and pudding. The list goes on and on. If the “bad” foods were the expensive food, then manufacturers would have to work their butts off finding ways to process the foods so that they are NOT on the list that gets the hell taxed out of them. If their white bread is more expensive than the whole wheat one, I guarantee people will start buying the wheat one. Get those cereal manufacturers that market to the kids to think twice about the empty fillers.

    Talk it up with the farmers. Change the frame of mind that exists. Good=cheaper.

    Make marijuana legal and tax the hell out of it.

    I know it’s not as simple as I make it sound. A policy person would have a field day with the zoozey-plan, but they have a field day with any plan.

    [Reply]

    kitkatborn
      

    (Report comment)

    I like it, Zo.

    Look y’all, I’m just as pissed off as the rest of the knowledgeable people are, but I also know that this, if it survives more sharp knife work is at least a start. To go back to square one would take another 10 years of deaths and bankruptcies that we can’t afford. The one bit of news that I find good is, they can’t blame failure on the public option. A weakened public option would have been a disaster.

    [Reply]

    zoozey
      

    (Report comment)

    True that.

    [Reply]

  2. (Report comment)

    “Looked at from the narrow lens of health care policy, there is a reasonable debate to be had among reform advocates over whether this bill is a net benefit or a net harm. But the idea that the White House did what it could to ensure the inclusion of progressive provisions — or that they were powerless to do anything about it — is absurd on its face. Whatever else is true, the overwhelming evidence points to exactly what Sen. Feingold said yesterday: “This bill appears to be legislation that the president wanted in the first place.”" – Glenn Greenwald

    http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/12/16/white_hou se/index.html

    [Reply]

    BeyondGoodAndEvil
      

    (Report comment)

    Great piece.

    [Reply]

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Jump to Top of Comments

Leave a Reply

In The Spotlight

Comments

Recent Comments

  • kellygrrrl on Weekend MOD
    UC President and Chancellor of Community College system resignfollowing CA Chamber of Commerce's end... »
  • kitkatborn on Having A Laugh
    Sadly, yes. »
  • kitkatborn on Wordsmithery
    :rofl: me either. »
  • MontanaHome on Having A Laugh
    Isn't that the truth. »
  • MontanaHome on Wordsmithery
    LOL - not sure I want to tackle that one!! »
  • MontanaHome on Comic Relief: Jo Brand
    I'm going to enjoy this a bit later - watching the teevee right now!!! »
  • MontanaHome on Weekend MOD
    Morons. Inarticulate, uneducated, stupid. Obama is "willfully destroying the country?" "I don't t... »
  • MontanaHome on Weekend MOD
    :bghd: Was at the gym this morning. Once again, 3 out of 4 teevee stations were tuned to fucksnoise.... »

Posts

Tags

Authors

Categories

In The Spotlight
-->